Audio Version Given Below
The
‘Equalization Levy’ has been in the news once again. This is because Government
of India widened the tax bracket of Equalization Levy in the Finance Act 2020,
passed on March 27th 2020. Now it is commonly being referred to as ‘Equalization
Levy 2.0’. The first instalment of widened Equalization Levy falls due on 7th
July 2020.
In
this article, I shall try to discuss the concept of ‘Equalization Levy’ (EL) and the impact of the same.
Before
we move ahead, let’s understand the basic meaning of equalization levy. Many
non-resident companies (Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, Netflix, Google to name a
few) are engaged in digital business in India.
They earn income from India but they escape the tax net taking the
advantage of Indian tax laws. This is unfair for domestic companies doing
similar businesses here. So to bring the non-resident companies at par with
Indian companies in terms of tax, a levy known as ‘Equalization Levy’ (commonly
known back then as ‘Google Tax’) was introduced.
Introduction
and Need of Equalization Levy
EL was
originally introduced in the Annual Budget of 2016 by Government of India. It
came into effect from 1st June 2016. It was introduced by adding a
separate chapter in the Finance Act 2016 and is not part of the Income Tax Act.
As per
the report by the Committee on Taxation of e-Commerce, CBDT (Government of
India), EL was recommended to reduce the unfair advantage in tax enjoyed by multinational entities engaged in digital business over the Indian companies. The Committee
studied the OECD’s report on Base Erosion & Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project.
This project aimed at identifying the challenges in tax with the advent of the
digital economy. This OECD report has been accepted by G-20 countries. It means
these countries have a common view on this issue.
Before
the EL was introduced, as per the Income Tax Act, a non-resident could only be
taxed in India in either of the following conditions:
a) Royalty
Income
b) Fee
for Technical Services Income (FTS)
c) General
Residual Category of Business Income
However,
the income earned by the non-resident multinational entities engaged in digital
business in India could not be taxed in any of the above criteria.
It
could not be charged as royalty as, the Indian entity paying the non-resident entity does not get any right on the servers of the latter.
Similarly,
It could also not be treated as FTS because as per the tax law in India, a
service rendered digitally or using technology could not be treated as
technical services.
It
could also not be charged as business income because, to be charged as business
income, such non-resident entities must have either a permanent establishment
in India or a Taxable presence in India. Permanent Establishment includes a
fixed place of business through which the business of the enterprise is wholly
or partially carried on.
The
non-resident entities in question do not have either of these in India. Their
servers are also located outside India so they could not be taxed for their
income earned from India.
Equalization
Levy 2016
With
the introduction of EL in 2016, even if the non-resident entities did not have
Permanent Establishment in India, their income from India could be taxed, if it
is earned from providing specified services.
Specified
services didn’t mean all services rendered by such non-resident
entity but only online advertisement or providing digital advertising space.
Rate: The
EL for specified services was charged at 6% of the amount received/receivable
excluding tax.
Revenue
Threshold: EL was not charged if the amount received/ receivable from
specified services rendered is less than Rs. 100,000 in the previous year,
whether paid once or paid at different times in the previous year.
Recipient
of service: EL was charged in case the non-resident entity
receives money from either of the following for providing specified services:
a) Resident
Indian carrying on business or profession
b) Non-resident
having a permanent establishment in India.
However,
the services should be for business activity and not for personal purpose.
For
Example, A company X Ltd. (Say, Facebook) provides online
advertising service of Rs. 200,000 to ‘A Limited’ (an Indian company) then ‘A Ltd’
will withhold Rs. 12,000 and deposit as EL with Government of India within 7
days from the end of the month in which service was provided.
It
should be noted that income received after being subject to EL is exempt from
Income Tax.
Equalization
Levy ‘2.0’: 2020
This
widens the scope of EL and now includes a non-resident e-commerce
operator providing goods or services online. The said e-commerce operator
(say, Amazon) does not have a Permanent Establishment in India.
The
goods or services sold may or may not be owned by the e-commerce operator. It
may fall into the tax bracket even if it is just facilitating the sale of such
goods or services and they belong to someone else.
Rate: The
EL in case of e-commerce operator will be 2% of amount received/ receivable
excluding tax. This is paid quarterly.
Buyer: EL
will be applicable if either of the following categories of buyers purchases
goods/ services from e-commerce operator:
a) Resident
Indian
b) Any
person using Indian IP Address (even if such person is a non-resident in India).
EL
will also apply if the e-commerce operator sells the following to a
non-resident:
a) Data
of Indian residents or persons using Indian IP address
b) Advertisement
targeting Resident Indian or person using Indian IP Address.
Revenue
Threshold: EL will not be charged if total revenue earned by the
e-commerce operator in the financial year is less than Rupees Twenty Million.
Payment
of EL: Unlike the 6% EL that is paid by the recipient by
withholding, EL, in this case, will be paid by the e-commerce operator.
The
same is to be deposited with the Government of India within 7 days from the end
of the quarter in which goods/services were sold.
For
Example, company P Ltd. (Say, Amazon) sells goods worth Rs.
30 Million to Resident Indians and persons using Indian IP Address in a
Financial Year, then EL of Rs. 600,000 will be charged and deposited by P Ltd.
Another
example can be if X Ltd (Say Facebook) sells an ad of a hotel in Australia and
targets it to Indian customers.
From
the above example, I would like to point out a difference in situations:
If X Ltd provides online advertising
services to A Ltd (An Indian company) then A Ltd withholds the EL
@ 6% and deposits it with GoI.
However,
if the same X Ltd. provides online advertisement service to a hotel in
Australia, targeting it to Indian customers then the EL will be paid by X
Ltd. and that to at a lower rate of 2%.
So
we need to remember, the EL of 2020 is just an addition and not a replacement
of 2016 EL.
Impact
of Equalization Levy in India
Now
that the scope of EL has widened, let's see the industries impacted due to this
levy as a whole.
Social
Media Companies and Search Engines: In my opinion, social media
and search engines (say, Facebook, Google) were the first to be affected. We
see ads of Indian and foreign companies on social media and search engines
promoting their products/services. EL on online advertising services has been
there since 2016. Now as per 2020 EL even ads of non-resident companies shown
by these companies will be taxable.
Online
Marketplace: Online marketplaces like Amazon will be
affected. Amazon provides a platform on which products owned by others are
hosted for sale.
Cloud
Computing Companies: Companies that are engaged in providing
software or infrastructure online as a service will be affected. For example,
Microsoft provides OneDrive cloud storage or Office 365, an online Office
Suite.
Online
Content Hosting: Today we watch online movies on Netflix. It is
a content hosted online. Such companies will get affected. Amazon also hosts
online content in terms of movies etc.
So,
we need to understand that just the company selling goods online is not a
market place. Services can also be sold online, as described above.
Recent
Developments
Following
developments have taken place after the introduction of EL 2020:
a) USTR
Investigation: The Office of US Trade Representative notified
on 2nd June 2020 about initiating an investigation in the Digital
Services Taxes (DST) of India and a few other countries including UK, Spain,
Italy and EU countries. The
investigation is started under section 301 of the US Trade Act. It empowers the
USTR to determine if policies of countries under investigation are
discriminatory to the US. If such investigation is found true then the USTR can
recommend imposing tariff, duties or trade sanctions on that country.
The
consultations with India are to be held.
b) Change
in ITNS 285 Challan: As the first due date of deposit of EL for
e-commerce operators is on 7th July 2020, so paving way for the
deposit, the Income Tax Department, GoI has amended the ITNS 285 Challan to
include ‘e-commerce operator for e-commerce supply of services’.
Even
though the widened EL has been effective for three months but I would say it is
still in a nascent stage. Clarifications are required in some points. FAQs on
the widened EL are awaited.
Conclusion
With
the introduction of the levy in its expanded form, sooner or later, these
online services will see a price rise, as these companies may pass on the tax
burden to consumers.
This
may lead to small shrinkage in demand for these services, still, I would
consider it as a good step for the Indian economy as a whole. This has opened
another stream of revenue for the Government from those companies which were
escaping the tax bracket all these years for the income earned in India.
***
I hope you all found this article
informative and interesting. I will try to post interesting articles in an easy
language in this blog. Please keep following and also do share your thoughts
about the blog and suggestions for future posts. You can ask me questions in
the comments section or mail them to me at askme[at]aseemjavablogs[dot]com and
I will try to answer them.
Want to read other articles? Click HERE
The article is very well written. The concept of Equalization levy has been explained with lot of clarity and in simple language.
ReplyDeleteI have a question. What will be the implications of this in terms of achieving level playing field and also how much revenue Government is expected to generate from it?
Thank you so much for your appreciation.
DeleteIn my opinion, the aim of EL is to give some level playing field in terms of tax. Now atleast the non-resident entities have come in the tax net for their digital businesses in India.
The revenue from EL is not a major source for the government. EL for FY 18 was approximately Rs. 7 Billion and approximately 9.5 Billion for FY 19.
This is a new stream of revenue for government. As digital business flourish in future, higher revenue will be achieved.
Nice Read
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot
DeleteThat’s a good explanation of complex tax matters
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot Uncle
DeleteNice explanation of a less discussed but complicated tax issue.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much.
DeleteVery well explained,Aseem
ReplyDelete